It has come to my attention that Miss Emily Kent has proposed certain claims as to my behavior on March 17, 2006. She has gone so far as to suggest that I was "The Menace with the Munchkins."
http://emilykent.blogspot.com/2007/11/menace-with-munchkins.html
I hold these claims to be both untrue and libel. In proposing that I may be "The Madonna with the Munchkins," I suggest a usage of the word Madonna as an idealized, virtuous woman. It is no doubt in the nature of justice to assign blame for the occurrences of that day. Defending myself, I could argue, in the words of Rolfe, “The responsibility [for these claims] will not be found only in documents. It will be found in consideration of a . . . social nature” (Judgment at Nuremburg, pg. 27). This argument would be logical. I could argue that “even able and extraordinary [people] can delude themselves into the commission of crimes and atrocities so vast and heinous as to stagger the imagination” (Judgment at Nuremburg, pg. 78). This argument would be logical. Yet, “to be logical is not to be right” (Judgment at Nuremburg, pg. 81). Thus, I shall attempt to tell you the truth, no more and no less. I suggest that “the responsibility for the crimes . . . must be placed in true perspective . . . it is a dilemma that rests with your conscience” (Judgment at Nuremberg, pg. 74).
To render justice to the events of that fateful day, I must return briefly to a similar day seven days earlier. It is on this day, the 10th of March, which my tale begins.
This day began, as most unpromising days do, with a zit. Mind you, this was no ordinary zit. This zit surpassed all others in stature.

In fact, this zit prompted a most ingenious piece of composing. I like to call it "A Rudolph Parody".
"Then one foggy March morning, Todd came to say,
'Brenda with your chin so bright, won't you drive our car tonight?'
Then how the Kents loved her as they shouted out with glee, 'Whee'
Brenda, the Zit-chinned mother, you'll go down in history!"
It is in the context of this mortal blemish that one must place the subsequent events.
As we traversed the many miles between College Station, Texas and Orlando, Florida, Emily found a particular “dot” amongst the rubble littering our car. This dot was the subject of much discourse throughout the day. Indeed, this dot prompted the following pictures…


Discussing the dot proved to be only the least of our entertainment. For Brenda took it upon herself to exclaim most fortuitously, “Look girls, devastation!!!!!” This shriek was of course accompanied by a fiendish giggle and a purely evil facial expression. No, reader, we were not traveling into the “Heart of Darkness.” We were passing the remains of Hurricane Katrina, which prompted sadness and sorrow in most of our family but had the strange effect of promoting interest in Brenda. After that sighting, Brenda spent the rest of the day scouting diligently for “devastation” to our utter chagrin.
This is the first part of my story. I have attempted to recount the episodes that occurred as we traveled to Disney World to give you a background from which to view the events happening as we traveled from Disney World.
We love road trips but only when they involve food. Seriously, can you imagine anything worse than sitting in the car for an entire day without food?????? Such an idea is inconceivable! Thus, as we wound towards Texas at a very unpleasant hour of the morning, a donut stop was in order.
Now allow me to digress momentarily. Perhaps you have had the pleasure of becoming acquainted with “Todd Time”. Those of you who nod “yes” are surely recalling “minutes” turning into hours before your very eyes. Yes, my dear father has a true gift when it comes to time. An 80-mile drive becomes “no more than 40 minutes.” Do not suppose that this is due to over-speedy driving. This 40 minute estimation must be taken as “Todd Time” and then exchanged for “Real Time.” Thus, when Dad spoke of a town “only a few minutes down the road,” we knew it was in our best interest to stop a the first place we saw rather than risk the unknown abyss of “Todd Time.”
We pulled over at Dunkin Donuts, and hastily rushed to fill our abundant appetites! After downing more than what could be deemed necessary for sustenance, we piled back into the car with a box of 50 “Munchkin” Donut Holes for the road. Of course, as soon as we squished into the car, Emily and Mom both insisted on going to the bathroom before leaving. They rushed off to the lue, and Dad decided to top off the gas tank while we were waiting. With Abby engrossed in her book, I was left all by my lonesome for quite some time (these bathroom breaks always take longer than they should).

Thus, we come to the point of our story. Did I eat the Munchkins? Yes. Does it necessarily follow that I alone was guilty in this crime? No.
What Emily fails to realize in her analysis of the situation is that if I had not been left in the car waiting for such a very long time, none of this would have occurred. If I am guilty of eating the Munchkins, then the rest of my family is equally guilty. While I may have done the chewing, their contributions to the situation were such that I may assume the Munchkins would not have been eaten if I hadn’t been left alone for so long. Ultimately then, if one is to find me guilty, one must also find my family guilty. In the words of Colonel Parker, “It is a dilemma that rests with your conscience” (Judgment at Nuremberg, pg. 74). I have tried to "speak in defense of reason" (The Eumenides, line 532)